• Welcome to Dark Bit Factory & Gravity.
 

Testing TTDblitzlib

Started by TinDragon, June 09, 2006

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinDragon

Attached is a test exe for a small part of the ttdblitzlib myself and zawran have been working on, it recreates the tunnel I did in blitz. Please let me know what fps you get so I can see how it's running for everyone else as it seems a chunk slower than I expected based on other tests.

Cheers
Jon

zparticle

I get 108 FPS with the original one and 102 with this new one. I still love the green texture.  :||

Ghost^BHT

92 fps on my office machine
P4 2.8 GHz - 512- built in gfx controller

Shockwave

94 fps, usual system.
Shockwave ^ Codigos
Challenge Trophies Won:

TinDragon

So it is slower for others as well, must be one of the loops or checks is slower than in blitz, cant see why everything else seems faster but it's still plenty fast enough ;)

Blitz Amateur

I dunno why, but I only get 57 FPS

AMD Athlon64 2.2Ghz, 1024Mb DDR, 256mb RADEON X800

TinDragon

I am getting 87fps just to add my own for comparison, which is a good 30fps slower than the blitz version yet if I just draw a pixel to every part of the screen in a loop FB is more than twice as fast which makes me think the problem is in some of the checks for the texturing.

PC is P4 Dual Core (3Ghz) 1024megs Ram and 512meg radeon X1300

Clyde

took a while to steady it's self to 63 fps here. And thats with a GF5500 / P4 2.66Ghz
Still Putting The IT Into Gravy
If Only I Knew Then What I Know Now.


Challenge Trophies Won:

Shockwave

How are you rendering the tunnel Jon?
Shockwave ^ Codigos
Challenge Trophies Won:

zawran

Here is my first working convertion of the tunnel I did in blitz.

http://zac-interactive.dk/temp/tunnel.zip

Ghost^BHT

21fps here - but as my pixel pushing power seems to suck - I would say most good cpus should get double that :)

TinDragon

Nice one Zawran, gives me 63fps which if memory serves correct is about 20fps faster than it was in blitz, which makes me wonder why mine is slower even more  ???   I must have coded something wrong or something

Shockwave

Better FPS here for that version Zawran, it gives 71fps.
Btw, no need to answer my previous question Jon, I see that it's working using Vortex Hypertyle technique.
Shockwave ^ Codigos
Challenge Trophies Won:

zawran

I tried googling for "Vortex Hypertyle" but can't find any relevant links. I wanted to see if it was the same technique as this tunnel. Do you have any links to places where this is described?

Shockwave

Shockwave ^ Codigos
Challenge Trophies Won: