Author Topic: C++0x hitting 2011  (Read 3498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline staticgerbil

  • Atari ST
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
C++0x hitting 2011
« on: January 12, 2011 »
Hey guys,

You may or may not have seen this but it looks like we might be getting the new version of c++ this year...

http://www.codeguru.com/cpp/misc/article.php/c18357/An-Interview-with-C-Creator-Bjarne-Stroustrup.htm

Offline LittleWhite

  • Senior Member
  • Amiga 1200
  • ********
  • Posts: 418
  • Karma: 31
  • It's me!
    • View Profile
Re: C++0x hitting 2011
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2011 »
In some point, it looks good even for me. But at the moment, I am not handling the C++ so well ... so the C++0x is a bit scaring to me :p

Thanks for the interview, really useful :up:
The demoscene will never die, never!

Offline staticgerbil

  • Atari ST
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: C++0x hitting 2011
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2011 »
There are certainly some things I'm interested in playing with, particularly lambda expressions.  Although I'm quite certain it will take me a long time to actually get in the habbit of using the new features when they do become a standard.

One thing I learnt about the existing c++ standard from that interview is that we can use "auto".  I had no idea that existed :D

Offline Jim

  • Founder Member
  • DBF Aficionado
  • ********
  • Posts: 5301
  • Karma: 402
    • View Profile
Re: C++0x hitting 2011
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2011 »
Lambda expressions in C#, and Linq, are utterly fantastic - how did we ever code without them?  I use Linq in almost every method I code.

I've seen nothing of the C++ spec for such a thing, I hope you get good things!  Any link to a sample of what you're getting?

Jim
Challenge Trophies Won:

Offline staticgerbil

  • Atari ST
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: C++0x hitting 2011
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2011 »
I don't have any particularly good links on me, most of what I know is striaght from other coders.

Wikipedia seems like it has a pretty good list of what we can expect and seems to match what I've heard before...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x

It's looking like Scott Myers is getting into c++0x, if he writes a book for it I think I'll grab that one.  I have his others and found them incredibly useful while I was (and still) learning.
http://www.aristeia.com/C++0x.html